Gujarat Riots: The True Story

The Truth of the 2002 riots

The Godhra Carnage

Difference between Godhra and other tragic incidents

Several people- unable to understand the sufferings of the Hindu society- have asked- “Why did riots occur only after Godhra? Why was nobody targeted after the Akshardham temple attack- or after the attacks on Mumbai on 26 November 2008?” Well- the answers are many.

Myth 1: 2,000 Muslims were killed in the Gujarat riots

Posted on May 22, 2008 - Filed Under 12-Concocted Lies and Myths by the media | 691 Comments

 Fact: 2000 is the number of Muslims who roasted to coal 59 Ram sevaks in Godhra, including 25 women and 15 children (including babies and toddlers), on 27 February 2002, not the number of Muslims killed in the subsequent Gujarat riots.

    As per figures given by the then Union Minister of State for Home Shriprakash Jaiswal, who belongs to the Congress Party, in Parliament on 11 May 2005, 790 Muslims and 254 Hindus were killed in the riots, 2548 people were injured and 223 people were missing. This was in a WRITTEN REPLY (meaning the UPA Government was fully aware of what it was doing) to a question asked by a Congress member (that Congress member was Babri Masjid Action Committee lawyer R K Anand) on the religion wise casualties in riots in Gujarat after Godhra. The report placed the number of riot-affected widows at 919 and the number of children orphaned at 606. The UPA government gives these figures, and hence they themselves could be inflated. To read the Rajya Sabha records click: or

Even Indian Muslims’ English newspaper Milli Gazette also reported this

BBC too reported the same.

The editorials of the national English dailies, and the articles published from the freelancers on the newspapers’ editorial pages are nothing but a pack of lies, akin the autobiography of former Pakistan President General Pervez Musharraf, “In the Line of Fire”. Newspapers like The Times of India, The Hindustan Times, The Indian Express, etc. continue to publish articles saying, “Win in Assembly elections of December 2002 does not whitewash Narendra Modi’s sins of the Gujarat pogrom of 2002 when 2000 innocent Muslims were butchered” or “The Gujarat pogrom of killing thousands of Muslims did not help the BJP in the long term” etc. etc.

But these numbers are nothing but a pack of lies. Let us see the interview given by the then Gujarat Chief Minister Narendra Modi to Aaj Tak’s Prabhu Chawla, excerpts of which were published in the weekly India Today, dated 4 November 2002:

“Q – Your opponents call you ‘Jinnah of the Hindus’.

A- I am hearing this for the first time though I still don’t consider you as an enemy.

Q- You are held responsible for the killing of 1,100 innocent people in the riots.

A- In our last interview, you said 900 people. Now you are saying 1,100. Are you adding all the people killed in other states like Maharashtra and Bengal to Gujarat’s account?(Narendra Modi is talking of the Solapur riots of 10 and 11 October 2002 in Maharashtra and other petty riots which occured long after Godhra and had nothing to do with Godhra and post-Godhra).

Q- So what is the correct toll?

A- There would have no riots in Gujarat if there had been no Godhra…

Q- Do you accept that you failed to provide security to the people of the state?

A- 98% of Gujarat would not have had peace if we had failed to fulfill our duties. We managed to control the riots in 72 hours…

Q- Why don’t you accept that Gujarat is being defamed because of Narendra Modi?

A- If that is true, give the people of Gujarat a chance to pronounce their verdict through elections.”


As we see, the number of people killed in the riots jumped from 900 to 1100 after Narendra Modi’s previous interview, i.e. within 4 months! Now it has jumped from 900 to 2,000. May be after 10 years, at this rate it will jump to 10,000!Already it is being said that, “thousands of Muslims were killed in Gujarat” and “3,000 innocent Muslims were butchered in Gujarat”. The death of a single innocent person, whether Hindu or Muslim or belonging to any other religion, is highly unfortunate and cannot be justified. That more than 1,000 people were killed is highly unfortunate and reprehensible. But that cannot a justification to exaggerate and inflate the number of people killed to 2,000 or any higher figure.

   That the UPA government, with Congress President and Italian-born and staunchly anti-BJP Sonia Gandhi as the UPA chief, and Communists as outside supporters, gave the figure of 790 Muslims and 254 Hindus killed in the Gujarat riots inside Parliament is something worth pondering about. These figures themselves may well be exaggerated given as they are by a Congressman, who worked under Sonia Gandhi.

  India Today weekly reported in its issue dated 20 May 2002, when the riots had almost stopped that “Total dead- 972” (For details, see page 122). Out of these 972, India Today included 57 people killed in Godhra, so the death toll post-Godhra was 915. If anyone sees the English newspapers of those days, i.e. between 10 to 21 May 2002, no riots took place in Gujarat in those 10 days at all, and the Army left Gujarat on 21 May. A maximum of 20 more deaths might have happened in Gujarat after that. The death toll in Gujarat riots would thus be 935.

   The Tribune reported on 30 April 2002 that the death toll crossed the 900 mark on 29 April. The riots had almost ended by that time and maximum 50 more would have been killed by 10 May 2002.And this was 2 months after the real violence of 28 Feb, 1st and 2nd March had ended, most of the bodies of the killings of these days had been found by 30 April.

  Thus there is no way at all that the toll could be anywhere close to 2,000. The 950-odd toll was exaggerated and inflated to 2000 by the liars some months after the riots. When riots ended, the final toll was 952, by which time most bodies of the earlier riots of February 28, 1 March and 2 March had been found.

  Central India’s English daily The Hitavada also reported that 936 people were killed in the Gujarat riots after the Army left Ahmedabad on 21 May 2002. The official figures before the missing were declared dead were 952. After 7 years, missing were declared dead- the toll was revised to 1180 by The Telegraph, which did not consider the missing people found (either found alive or dead) and simply added 228 to 952 to make it 1180.

Let us, for argument’s sake, assume that the figures given by the UPA government are correct. Does that give anyone the reason to believe that more than 790 Muslims were killed in Gujarat? Why should the English dailies and the 24-hour news channels lie through the skin of their teeth that 2000 Muslims were killed in Gujarat?

Actually, the figures given initially said 228 people missing (closely matched by the UPA Government also saying 223 people missing in Parliament on 11 May 2005) and later 101 people were found alive, so the final missing people’s figure is 127 only. The official statistics show that 101 people were found alive and 127 people are still missing and hence assumed dead after the 7-year period is over. Ex-gratia was paid to 1,169 people by the Gujarat Government. The UPA Government also paid extra compensation to Gujarat riot victims in May 2008 in a special package in the final year of its first term. Even this UPA Government said ex-gratia was paid to 1169 people.

   This shows that the death toll is less than or equal to 1169 since it is absolutely impossible that the UPA Government will fail to give ex-gratia to families of people killed in the riots when the riots have been politicized so much, and when it attacked Narendra Modi on this issue so much, and when its leaders spread huge lies on the riots with exaggerations. (And if the UPA, which is a staunch opponent of Narendra Modi claims that any more than 1169 people were killed in the riots, then it itself would be admitting that it did not pay compensation to some killed people’s families!) UPA’s figures in Parliament would amount to 1171 deaths- 790 Muslims, 254 Hindus and 127 missing people (after many missing were found alive), 790+254+127= 1171. This closely matches the ex-gratia figure of 1169, paid by both the Gujarat and the UPA Government.

  Despite this NDTV reported many times during the Lok Sabha elections of April- May 2004 that, “2000 Muslims were killed in Gujarat” exaggerating and as if not a single Hindu was killed and implying that the riots were one-sided.

  2,000 is the number of Muslims who carried out the massacre and gruesome roasting alive of 59 Hindus-including 25 women and 15 children in Godhra. It is not the number of Muslims who were killed in the subsequent riots. There is no justification for violence and of even a single death, be it in Godhra or after Godhra. But why lie? Who gains by these lies? And it is everybody’s duty to correct the figure. The point is, what should be reported is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

   And it is this mentality which is responsible for them exaggerating the number of Muslims killed in the riots to as much as possible. When the total number of people killed in the riots- Hindu as well as Muslim- is 1,169, they lie that 2,000 Muslims were killed in the riots just like former Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf did in the United Nations in September 2002. Teesta Setalvad increased this number to 2,500 Muslims (as if not a single Hindu was killed) in one of her articles titled What ails Gujarat” published in CPI(M) party weekly Peoples Democracy in its issue of 16 July 2006. And Tehelka reported in 2007 after its sting operation that 2,500 Muslims were killed in the first 3 days! This would imply that many more were killed in the next days of riots!!!

A must read article is on the role of the Gujarat Government in controlling violence in the riots.

Some more details are given in the book. To know the details, read the book.

Copyright ©


You can follow us on twitter at

After numerous requests from readers, we have opened a Facebook page as well, on 17 Feb 2014. You can ‘like’ our Facebook page here:


691 Responses to “Myth 1: 2,000 Muslims were killed in the Gujarat riots”

Pages: « 70 69 68 [67] 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 … 1 » Show All

  1. 670
    Fake Name Says:

    how can you say that? no matter which religion’s men or women or children were killed. they were all humans. you cant just say that it was all Muslim people’s fault. you are stating that the number of muslims was exaggerated okay then. but still more number of muslims were killed. and you are still blaming them. Regardless of whether Modi’s directly involved or not, he was inefficient in performing did not perform his basic duty of protecting the people under his people – the riots raged for two whole months. there was a situation and as a leader, he did not react to that. how can he run the country efficiently?

  2. 669
    no name INDIA Says:

    ok.. so after all this he stands in to become the pm of this country, are you kidding me,if he does become the pm all that will happen is gujarat riot all over again and this time bigger and better version both communities muslims and christians will be suffering and the country will be havoc now we cant do much but make people aware of this situation facebook,twitter,whatsapp whatever it is friends family members and how many ever people we can reach just ask them to make a better choice than modi ,lets make the right choice india’s future is in our hands

  3. 668
    Zain Says:

    Okay 790 were killed, my question – why were they killed? To compensate and take revenge on the 2000 Muslims that killed the 56 Hindus? So if tomorrow Modi becomes PM and there is a blast in a temple killing several of Hindus rather then punishing the people who were responsible for it he would go ahead and kill us innocent Muslims to teach the terrorists a lesson?

  4. 667
    Raaj Says:

    Modi is bloody …… This …… excepted 900 people killed in the first interview and denied 1100 in the second interview. This means he is a culprit …..He accepted that he killed 900 innocents

  5. 666
    admin AUSTRALIA Says:

    “40,000 hindus were thrown out of their houses ” What are talking about???
    Please support this statement of yours with a valid proof…

    Please read this article in full:
    The Times of India dated 18 March 2002 gave a report exclusively to Hindu victims of the riots titled “Riots hit all classes, people of all faith” and says that “Contrary to popular belief that only Muslims have been affected in the recent riots, more than 10,000 people belonging to the Hindu community have also become homeless. The Indian Express dated 7 May 2002 and 10 May 2002 also gave reports exclusively dedicated to Hindu victims who were homeless. As on 25 April 2002, out of the 1.4 lakh refugees in relief camps, 1 lakh were Muslims and 40,000 were Hindus.

  6. 665
    Abdul Malik Says:

    “40,000 hindus were thrown out of their houses ” What are talking about???
    Please support this statement of yours with a valid proof…

  7. 664
    MS INDIA Says:

    You have mentioned Islams Guilt.What does it means?
    Islam is a religion.Islam is a peaceful religion for all man kind.Please do not defame any religion to support your personal views.

  8. 663
    Fake Name AUSTRALIA Says:

    Being a responsible citizen of India, I think, you people are just testing your vocabulary. Please don’t comment without having enough knowledge about the topic.
    Just because of few people we are ruled by those who have made our life as good as hell.

    Thanks to you all.

    That’s the reason why $1 is equal to more than 60 INR. Also, India is still 200 years behind American.
    We run behind such issues and forget about future. Because we are more human than others, and we can blame anyone without knowing the truth.

    Good bye and be prepared to answer future with such stupid and ridicules thought and that too baseless.

    Thanks to all of you responsible citizens of India.
    Test you vocabulary as much as possible.

    Good going. All the best.

  9. 662
    Devesh INDIA Says:

    a supposed-”leader” failed in his duty to provide protection to the subjects in his state. for a human being,security and protection and the right to exist comes even before development. and now this man wants to lead a nation. how can he be even called a leader? he’s simply a neta – a politician.
    in a workplace, when a team-leader fails to lead his team efficiently, he’s thrown out of the workplace.
    Regardless of whether he’s directly involved or not, he was inefficient in performing did not perform his basic duty of protecting the people under his people – the riots raged for two whole months. there was a situation and as a leader, he did not react to that. how can he run the country efficiently?
    the funny part is, he hasn’t even paid for his inefficiency. now he wants a big promotion.

  10. 661
    Fake name INDIA Says:

    If he kills even one person, then too he is liable to be punished. He is no special a person, in fact no one is special. Opening up a website only to spread fake numbers of people killed is a good proof of the fact that he still has no remorse.

    Killed 1 or 2, he took oath to protect them, but “LIKE A SNAME,” poisoned them only in name of fuddu ideology

Pages: « 70 69 68 [67] 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 … 1 » Show All

Leave a Reply

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • IndianPad
  • Reddit
  • Technorati