Posted on October 8, 2012 - Filed Under 12-Concocted Lies and Myths by the media | 9 Comments
FACT: Balbir Punj writes-“Blatant myths and fiction have lacerated the facts on Gujarat. The Times of India (March 3) reported Modi’s much-publicised misquote of Newton’s third law—”Every action has an equal and opposite reaction”. In fact, the CM had never said such a thing and no other paper except for Times of India had carried the misquote in its original reportage. But later on, numerous editorials were penned on the basis of this canard. All his denials were thrown in the dustbin…”
Virendra Kapoor wrote in Cybernoon on 19 March 2002-
“An angry Modi wrote to the English daily, which had first put the quote in his mouth, protesting that he had never met its correspondent nor had he an occasion to say what he had been quoted as having said and that it was only fair that the paper made amends for its wholly ‘inventive reportage.’ The newspaper editors, however, refused to do so and two weeks later were still sitting on Modi’s letter. Left to himself perhaps the paper’s senior-most editor may well have published Modi’s letter but since his writ does not run and the place is teeming with new-fangled journalists who openly talk of blacking out all news about the Sangh Parivar, and the paper’s management is only obsessed with packing nothing other than revenue-earning advertisement in its columns, Modi’s letter has not been published. Modi, therefore, is not entirely wrong in complaining of the bias of the media and the attempt to tar his image. For, the quote in the said paper was immediately recycled and rehashed by the rest of the print and audio visual media.
Inquiries reveal that no one from the paper had met the Gujarat Chief Minister on the day he is supposed to have quoted Newton’s law to its correspondent to justify the revenge killings of the minority community in Ahmedabad and other places in the state. The paper’s editors too have concluded that the said quote was ‘invented’ by the correspondent to indicate ‘the attitude of the Modi government.’ Indeed, it was all a cooked up job to justify what the paper’s deputy bureau chief in New Delhi said at a gathering of secularist scribes to ‘fight the fascist forces and not to give them any space in ‘our’ papers.’
Time the owners woke up to this little upstart who seeks to usurp the ownership of their paper for his own brand of fascism.
Meanwhile, Modi is contemplating taking his complaint to the Press Council of India.”
In an interview to weekly India Today published in its issue of 8 April 2002, Narendra Modi said:
On his controversial statements
“After the riots began, I was quoted as saying that every action has an opposite reaction. The fact is I never said anything of that kind but one newspaper had a headline that said I had. I later wrote to the editor of the newspaper asserting that I had never said it. The electronic media was there at that press conference of mine. You can check the tapes.”
And in an interview with The Hindustan Times published on 10 March 2002 Narendra Modi said:“I made no statement of that kind. One big newspaper reported that I quoted Newton’s law of every action having an equal and opposite reaction. I have never quoted Newton since I left school. I cannot help if people allow themselves to be guided by their predilections and fantasies. I’m willing to suffer if that helps the society. I plead with those opposed to me to wait till normalcy is restored in Gujarat…”
Even the Supreme Court-appointed Special Investigating Team (SIT) said in its report submitted to the court that there is no evidence at all of Narendra Modi saying “Every action has equal and opposite reaction” and his statements were quoted out-of-context and twisted. The media could not digest this and tried to paint the SIT as a team which gave a report which Modi’s advocate would do. So if Modi did not say that every action has equal and opposite reaction, should the SIT have forcibly claimed this false charge? Note here that the SIT was formed by judges of the Supreme Court who are known to comment against Narendra Modi like Justice Arijit Pasayat, Justice Aftab Alam. The former Gujarat Lokayukta and former judge of the Gujarat High Court Justice Soni wrote to the Chief Justice of India asking Aftab Alam to be kept away from Gujarat riots cases as he was ‘communal minded’. Justice Alam had spoken in London in 2009 in a speech revealing his ideology. Aftab Alam’s daughter is also a known activist against the Gujarat Government. This SIT reported to a bench which included Aftab Alam as well and its members were also chosen by the Supreme Court. Even such an SIT found no basis in this false charge of Modi saying “Every action has equal and opposite reaction”. More details of Justice Soni’s letter to the CJI can be found here.
When anyone makes an allegation, he has to prove it. No one has ever been able to prove that Modi ever uttered these words. And these people- far from apologizing- have not even published Modi’s denials.
(An article on some facts about the media can be read here “NDTV is CPM Today“. And another article which is worth reading is “The channels strategy of attacks”. Note that these articles are purely the view of the blogger and not of Gujaratriots.com)
You can follow us on twitter at https://twitter.com/Gujaratriotscom
After numerous requests from readers, we have opened a facebook page as well, on 17 Feb 2014. You can ‘like’ our facebook page here: