Gujarat Riots: The True Story

The Truth of the 2002 riots

The Godhra Carnage

Difference between Godhra and other tragic incidents

Several people- unable to understand the sufferings of the Hindu society- have asked- “Why did riots occur only after Godhra? Why was nobody targeted after the Akshardham temple attack- or after the attacks on Mumbai on 26 November 2008?” Well- the answers are many.

Myth 20: Zakia Jafri’s complaint against Narendra Modi is a genuine one

Posted on October 8, 2012 - Filed Under 12-Concocted Lies and Myths by the media | 17 Comments

FACT: First thing to be noted is that Zakia Jafri did not make any complaint against Narendra Modi at all, for as many as 4 years after the 2002 riots, i.e. until 2006! In this time, she made statements before the police, the Nanavati Commission, filed affidavits in the courts as well and never once made any complaint against Narendra Modi. It is only after 2006 that she began speaking against Modi, perhaps tutored by some influential ‘activists’ when they saw this as a chance to frame and crucify the biggest fish!

The complaint, filed against Modi and 61 others including Government officials and State Ministers by the wife of late Congress leader Ehsan Jafri who was killed in the 2002 riots , was a bundle of inexplicable factual errors, legal loopholes and wild allegations and virtually looked like a tutored child’s complaint , simply impossible to prove.

Factual blunders

Zakia Jafri’s complaint has named a man as Babubhai Rajput, worker of the BJP as accused No 24. The SIT after probing the case found that no such person was in existence at the time of the 2002 riots! (On page 19 of its report). He of course does not live at the address provided in the complaint now.

The complaint has a charge that the Anand district police chief B S Jebalia was not only a witness to the massacre at Ode village soon after the Godhra carnage of 27 February 2002 but was also an abettor in it through a blatant connivance. The truth is that another police officer, B D Vaghela, and not Jebalia , was posted as Anand district police chief at that time!

Zakia’s complaint also says that the then Chief Secretary Subba Rao participated in the February 27 (2002) night meeting in which it alleged Chief Minister gave orders to officers to direct law enforcement agencies to allow Hindus to give vent to their feelings in reaction to Godhra carnage. But the fact is Subba Rao was on leave on that day and instead of him it was acting Chief Secretary S K Varma who participated in the meeting. This blunder has been made by many Narendra Modi-baiters, such as weekly Outlook in its article dated 3 June 2002 trying to nail Modi forcibly. Obviously, Zakia Jafri engaged some people to do some search and make allegations. This single blunder is enough to see through the claims of people like Zakia Jafri and magazines like Outlook.

But that is not all! Many persons who had either no direct connection with the 2002 riots or had in fact played positive role in controlling the riots have been named as conspirators and abettors in the complaint filed by Zakia Jafri. These seriously militate against the established canons of law and justice. For example, former Ahmedabad police commissioner KR Kaushik who was brought on to the post to control the riots has also been named as an accused. How can Kaushik be accused as an abettor or conspirator when he had been brought in to control the riots and after whose arrival there was further improvement in law and order situation in Ahmedabad ? Actually the Commissioner P C Pandey’s removal was demanded (despite the fact that he too did a commendable job) and as the controversy escalated in 2002, Kaushik was appointed. He was appointed on 10 May 2002, after which riots virtually ended, and the Army did not need to remain in Ahmedabad within 10 days, as it left on 21 May 2002.

The riots, thus, ended very soon after Kaushik took charge.

The complaint has been filed by people who either did not know this fact, or did not know the reason behind Kaushik’s appointment and the fact that after his appointment there was further improvement in law and order in Ahmedabad.

Zakia Jafri has further alleged in her complaint that the remains of the slain karsevaks were purposefully brought from Godhra to Ahmedabad “in a ceremonial procession” on February 27 after the carnage at Godhra railway station in order to instigate Hindus to target Muslims. Of course, this is again wrong on facts!

The fact is that the bodies were brought to Ahmedabad after midnight of February 27 in a very sombre atmosphere and not in a ceremonial procession. Also, the bodies were brought to the then isolated Sola Civil Hospital on the western outskirts of Ahmedabad as a precautionary measure and not to the Ahmedabad’s main civil hospital which is located in eastern Ahmedabad from where most of the killed karsevaks came. Sola Civil Hospital was in 2002 located in the far outskirts of Ahmedabad and had very little population around it. This shows the Government’s efforts to control the situation.

   Had the Government planned to instigate the Hindus then it would have brought the bodies to the Ahmedabad’s main civil hospital in Eastern Ahmedabad where most of the karsevaks resided and from where it would have been ideal to orchestrate violence against Muslims. We also seen various other steps taken to control and prevent violence in previous chapters.

Wild allegations

But the most unimaginable allegation she makes against the Chief Minister Narendra Modi is that while issuing instructions to his officials in the February 27 night meeting to give long rope to Hindu rioters Modi also indicated that Hindus be encouraged to “indulge in sexual violence against Muslim women”. This whole mischievous and manufactured charge has to be seen in the light of the fact that many Muslim witnesses who claimed to have witnessed acts of rape on Muslim women in their 2003 affidavit before the Supreme Court later told the SIT in May, 2009 that they had been made to make the false charge by human rights activists. India Today weekly’s report titled “Inhuman Rights”in its issue dated 5 April 2010 has, for a change, completely dismantled the human rights lobby.

In the first place, we have already seen in Myth 19 as to how fake and phony this charge of Narendra Modi telling officers to go slow on Hindus or ‘allow Hindus to vent their anger’ is. Narendra Modi is also not a fool to openly give such orders to so many officials in such a meeting where any of the officers could have secretly recorded such orders or which would have created 8 witnesses against Narendra Modi. If he did want such orders to be issued, he would have done it through middlemen and other communicators being careful not to come into the picture directly! It is astonishing to see that no one with an iota of common sense has till now raised this point. Assuming that Narendra Modi did give such instructions in that 27 Feb meeting, is it believable that he would have told police officials and other authorities to tell Hindus to ‘indulge in sexual violence against Muslim women’? This is an utterly unbelievable and far-fetched allegation. And in the third place, irrespective of what Narendra Modi said in that meeting, we know that the police did not at all allow Hindus to vent their anger the next day, or the remaining days. We say how curfew was imposed, 1000+ rounds fired on the first day including 600+ in Ahmedabad, 17 shot dead by police, 700 arrests made etc etc.

In support of her charge that Modi gave instructions to his officials not to act against Hindu rioters in the February 27 night meeting she produces only one piece of evidence, namely the deposition of former Gujarat IPS officer RB Sreekumar who told the Nanavati Commission in an affidavit and later also the SIT that the then Director General of Police VK Chakravarty, who participated in that crucial February 27 meeting, told him that the CM had directed officers to go slow against Hindu rioters and allow them to give vent to their feelings against the Muslims. Chakravarty has denied ever saying this to Sreekumar.

What Chakravarty and many other officials involved with police department at that time told the Nanavati Commission was exactly the opposite. They said Modi had told them to control the riots. Plus, Sreekumar started making anti-Modi charges in the case only after the Government denied him promotion on strong grounds. He didn’t make the same charge in his first two affidavits.

We have already seen in Myth 19 the truth of the 27 February meeting. Also note here that the SIT appointed by the Supreme Court with judges like Arijit Pasayat and Aftab Alam who have commented against the Gujarat Government many times, debunked the claim of Sanjiv Bhat that he was present and blamed NGOs for forcibly trying to find something against Narendra Modi. This is a must read report of the SIT.

Also note that Ehsan Jafri fired on the Hindu crowd outside his house in self-defense on 28 Feb 2002. This was reported by The Times of India online on 28 Feb and in weekly Outlook dated 11 March 2002 also in weekly India Today dated 18 March 2002 and also on 5 April 2010. It is a well established fact that Jafri fired on the Hindu crowd in self-defense. But Zakia Jafri denied even this basic fact as reported by weekly India Today dated 18 March 2002. That is, in its 18 March 2002 issue India Today reported that “Zakia Jafri denies that Ehsan Jafri fired on the mob”.

In her first statement to the police recorded under section 161 of CrPC on 6 March 2002, Zakia herself stated that timely action by the police saved them and they were shifted in jail vans on 28 Feb 2002, else the mob would have lynched all of them. That statement was totally opposite to her later complaint, about which she had no personal knowledge at all. The SIT has stated that Zakia was examined on 7 November 2008 and she could not state a single charge made in her own complaint! SIT also said at another place that it is Teesta Setalvad’s complaint made in Zakia’s name.

The media hid from the public for many years that a top accused in this case was none other than Congress leader Meghsingh Chaudhary himself. He was arrested not by Gujarat police, but by the SC-appointed SIT itself in 2009.

Legal loopholes

There are several law sections applied in the complaint which are simply inapplicable in the manner she has done. Like Jafri has asked section 193 of IPC to be applied which is about giving false evidence in court during judicial proceedings. But this section can be applied only by the court and not an individual. Then Section six of the Commission of Inquiry Act has also been slapped on the accused by Jafri which only a commission of inquiry can apply.

Then the Protection of Human Rights Act too is wrongly invoked in the complaint whose actual prayer is that the complaint should be turned into an FIR for registering cases against Modi and other accused as conspirators and abettors in the 2002 riots.

Interestingly, the many factual and other contradictions in Jafri’s complaint show that old complaints of 2002 filed by Muslims and human rights activists with a view to building a case against the Modi government and having it pulled down under Article 356 of the Constitution had been put together in a footloose manner for Jafri by some low level lawyer in a form of one full-fledged complaint. Clearly, the situation stands reversed. Narendra Modi can now file a defamation case against Jafri. The role of the media in all this is of course, disgusting. It is simply impossible that the “Gujarat-obsessed” media would not have known these facts. But they did not bother to report them. Not a single paper has ever bothered to publish these facts, so much is their hatred for Narendra Modi. The media knows that if the truth of Zakia Jafri’s complaint comes out, even the most biased judge cannot convict Narendra Modi or entertain the complaint and hence it is suppressing all these facts.


 More details of this complaint’s childish nature and numerous mistakes are given comprehensively in the book, but not in this website. A special chapter on the SIT report is also in the book, which reveals everything about this complaint’s nature and the SIT’s observations.

Copyright ©


You can follow us on twitter at

After numerous requests from readers, we have opened a Facebook page as well, on 17 Feb 2014. You can ‘like’ our Facebook page here:



17 Responses to “Myth 20: Zakia Jafri’s complaint against Narendra Modi is a genuine one”

Pages: [2] 1 » Show All

  1. 17
    Spati INDIA Says:

    take history as evidence
    in every bloodshed the main culprits are muslims, when they r majority they try to kill others

  2. 16
    eternal truth Says:

    Riot 1: 1947 Communal riots in Bengal | 5000-10000 Killed | Ruling party happened to be Congress

    Riot 2: 1964 Communal riots in Rourkela & Jamshedpur | 2000 Killed | Ruling party Congress

    Riot 3: August 1967 | 200 Killed | Communal riots in Ranchi | Party ruling again Congress

    Riot 4: 1969 | Communal riots in Ahmedabad | More than 512 Killed in the city. 3000 to 15000 range in the entire state | Riots for 6 months | Ruling party happened to be Congress

    Riot 5: 1970 | Bhiwandi communal riots in Maharashtra | Around 80 killed | Ruling party Congress

    Riot 6: April 1979 | Communal riots in Jamshedpur, West Bengal | More than 125 killed | Ruling party CPIM (Communist Party)

    Riot 7: August 1980 | Moradabad Communal riots | Approx 2000 Killed | Ruling Party Congress

    Riot 8: Feb 1983 | Communal violence in Nellie, Assam | 2000-5000 killed | PM – Indira Gandhi (Congress party) – India’s worst slaughter of Muslims in any single riot (just 6 HOURS)

    Riot 9: May 1984 | Communal riots in Bhiwandi | 146 Killed, 611 Inj | Ruling party Congress | CM – Vasandada Patil

    Riot 10: Oct 1984 | Communal riots in Delhi | 2733 Killed | Ruling party Congress | Almost 100% casualty were Sikhs, which makes this a Rajiv Gandhi led genocide on India’s minorities | Followed by “Big Tree falls” justification too from the Prime Minister!

    Riot 11: April 1985 | Communal riots in Ahmedabad, Gujarat | At least 300 Killed | Ruling party Congress

    Riot 12: July 1986 | Communal violence in Ahmedabad, Gujarat | 59 Killed | Ruling party Congress

    Riot 13: Apr-May 1987 | Communal violence in Meerut, UP | 81 killed | Ruling party Congress

    Riot 14: October 1989 | Bhagalpur, Bihar riots | 800 to 2000 killed | Ruling party Congress

    Riot 15: December 1990 | Hyderabad, AP | At least 132 killed | Ruling party Congress

    Riot 16: Dec 1992 | Aligarh, UP | At least 176 killed | Ruling party Congress (President’s rule)

    Riot 17: December 1992 | Surat, Gujarat | At least 175 killed | Ruling party Congress

    Riot 18: Dec 1992 – Jan 1993 | Mumbai, Maharashtra riots | 800 to 2000 killed | Ruling party Congress

    Why are we so obsessed with just 2002 Gujarat riots ? so what’s it – lets be honest , do we have problem with riots or with Modi?


  3. 15
    Mohit Says:

    Defamation case is a must to stop further witch hunting by so called called secular forces.

  4. 14
    laxman narasimman AUSTRALIA Says:

    i feel from my bottom of the heart the pain of the victims and of modi since modi with all good intentions got to face this onslaught from several people. I still couldn’t understand why this onslaught on modi even today? what they had enmity before this with modi or modi had on them. both no. why they should do such evil deeds? is it to make money? is it not they are zero ability people who can’t earn money with their other talents? they all have good communication skills, upcountry convent education, etc.,

    I feel pathetic to see some neutral people also involved in this malicious campaign against modi. I know congress would have wanted and created some by paying money. also I feel some vhp-bajrangdal people who may be fanatics would have done riots in retaliation to tarin fire incident. also after reading above I feel ehsan jafri with politician’s arrogance shooted some hindus standing and shouting outside his house in self-defence(why I don’t see self-defence is while a police officer offered him to go by back passage, why he shooted? maybe to incite violence? this has been congress’s culture in Gujarat. modi only sincerely did controlled all these and allowed Gujarat to flourish and prosper as of today. though gujaratis are good there was a simmering tension between hindus and muslims always. congress want to encash as votes and they want to do this as usual. henceforth this game can’t happen in india. modi is for only peace, equality of Indians and growth of all Indians, hence all our present day problesm will slowly go away.

  5. 13
    k h rathod Says:

    Shri Modi should file defamation case against media and zafri both

  6. 12
    Sajid Says:

    We are completely doing doing whatever is asked by our Politicians to do from time to time :-

    1. Babri Masjid many killed
    2. Gujarat Riot thousands Killed
    3. Mujaffar Nagar thousand killed and thousand are still without shelter..
    4. Thousand of youngsters who are innocent are behind bars….
    5. People who are responsible for probing riots are been “Praised”.

    5 lines are purposely left blank for further instances, What will we gain after ruining lifes of thousands of innocent and poor people, we are not killing Muslims we are killing humanity.

    Please forget about religion and follow humanity with open heart…..

    Wrong should always be wrong and right should always be right irrespective of cast, creed and religion.

    I only pray that this fight should end Nationally only ………

  7. 11
    santosh nayak INDIA Says:

    i requestMr. Narendra Modi to sue all the people who had conspired against him.only then no body will dare level false allegation against anybody in India.

Pages: [2] 1 » Show All

Leave a Reply

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • IndianPad
  • Reddit
  • Technorati