26 Responses to “Our Challenge”

1. Indian in Australia on January 2nd, 2012 1:48 AM

   http://www.islaminindia.org/category/13-evidence-that-islam-is-false/logical-proofs
   1- http://www.islaminindia.org/uncategorized/would-a-true-god-keep-80-humans-unaware-of-islam-his-%E2%80%98only-true-religion%E2%80%99-241

2. indian on December 31st, 2011 1:13 AM

   @Indian engineer can you pin point exactly what incorrect this site has written? Prove this site wrong. Refute them and bring your proofs. And for the record RSS has supported dalit reservation always. See k sudarshans speech on dussera in nagpur on 4 oct 2003 and mohan bhagwats speech on 6 oct 2011. For women there is a separate wing called Rashtra Sevika Sammiti which has a woman as its pramukh sanchalika i.e. chirf who is pramila medhe. Look at the service done by RSS to dalits and in calamities. Hatred is caused by those who believe Quran is gods word and quran orders them to convert or kill. Read 9:5,8:39,8:12,9:14,9:17, 9:28,9:29,9:39,9:110,9:123,8:65, etc etc.

3. IndianEngineer on December 28th, 2011 4:26 PM

   You people are paid full time stooges of RSS. You are the believers of Hitler’s Ideology and followers of Golwalkars legacy. Your ideology killed Gandhi, Your ideology divided Hindus between n number of castes.
   If RSS is working for humanity, then will you advocate for a BHNAGI to be made as Shankaracharya? Will RSS ever appoint a Dalit as Priest? Will RSS make a woman as its Sarsanghchalak?
   Will RSS support reservations for Dalits and Backwards?
   Just by spreading Goebellion lieas you can not be a good human being forget about being muslim or Hindu.
   Really you people are shame on humanity.

4. admin on September 17th, 2011 10:17 PM

   Dear Admin

   I have nothing against the content of your website, seems extremely genuine, a casual reading of this website would probably exonerate narendra Modi of all the allegations he faces.

   I am, however, confused when I take this and the other goings on together and put it on a single plate, let me explain

   1. Gujarat riots has and will be the achilles heel of BJP for times to come, if the information provided by you is freely available, it is possible for BJP to get rid of their communal image and don a progressive face, then why is the BJP not making any use of this?, is the BJP not aware of the facts? I do not believe so since this is not so far down in History, another arguement can be infighting amongst BJP leaders, but the question is whether the infighting is such that they would commit political suicide together?

   Answer: There are 2 kinds of people in the BJP- those who are ideologically committed and those who are not. Those who are not, do not bother to take too much trouble to correct this. Among those who are, very few have this knowledge. . BJP now has all this information, but doesnt seem to make any use of it. It could be due to sheer brain paralysis, or due to their ‘some secret strategy’ or any other reeason. One leader of the RSS said that “The perception that ‘Muslims were taught a lesson’ in Gujarat” is there in the outside world. Many Hindus are happy with Narendra Modi for that and they will feel very disappointed if the truth comes out, that even in Gujarat what happened was not one-sided.” This was in May 2008. He also said that had Modi lost the 2007 Gujarat polls, then there would have been a need to bring out all these things, but since Modi won, this subject is closed and there is no need to bring it out again.

   2. There have been various agencies which are probing the riots, have you ever appeared before those agencies and provided them with these documents?

   Answer: We have no locus standi to do this. We have given this information to many high ups. We think some of this information may have been given to the agencies by some people who were probed, such as Narendra Modi himself in his questioning with SIT on 27 March 2010.

   3. You have produced contents from various newspapers, how sure are you that the correspondents had documentary evidence and that it was not heresay

   Answer: Very sure. We also have official records which match absolutely with the newspapers’ reports. Most of the information that we have taken is from very biased anti-BJP papers who have made huge allegations on BJP and Narendra Modi- such as The Times of India, The Hindu, The Indian Express etc. These papers have lied AGAINST Narendra Modi, so there is no reason why these papers will report facts in favour of Narendra Modi wrongly. If these anti-BJP papers have written these facts in favour of Narendra Modi, then they must be true, and the truth may be even more. For example, The Hindu reported on 1 March 2002 that on 28 Feb, the first day of the riots, 10 people were shot dead by police. What it did not report was that at least 2 others were also shot dead outside Ahmedabad (something reported by The Telegraph), and that 16 were also injured, and that police arrested as many as 700 people on the first day, even though the situation was out of control, or that 827 preventive arrests were made, etc. Actually, the bias of these papers can be seen from the fact that not one of them reported the steps taken by the administration fully. Some papers reported some steps, others some steps, which had to compiled together.

   Also, we have official records which also state the same things.

   4. If there are indeed documents available to prove the truth of the riots, why are all agencies Supreme Court of this country included are dragging their feet, brings me to the basic question did you make these documents available to them? if not why not?

   Answer: As said earlier, we have no locus standi to make these documents available to the courts. We have tried to give them to those concerned and hope they use them. We also have original documents of these things. What we tried to do after writing this book in May 2007 was to create a website. We were saying for 1 year to many on the need to create a website- but no help was got. Finally in May 2008 with the help of someone in USA we managed to launch this site, on our own.

   5. Will you, instead of keeping this a mere propaganda, try to pursue cases in courts of law in India?

   Answer: We have advocated filing of defamation suits against the media in general, and Tehelka in particular.The author is a 23-year old guy who wrote this book when he was 19. The idiots advised him to file a case at 19 (how can he do that- when he had no lawyers, no experience, no locus standi and he was a student etc). We have talked to many senior lawyers here about filing defamation cases, who have tried to contact a lawyers’ association. There is a limit to what we can do.

   You see why I am confused, I am not challenging anything which you have re-produced but the fact that none of this is public for quiet sometime really disturbs me and makes me question the veracity of what has been given here, waiting to hear from you

   Answer: We have tried our best to make this public. The author used to write many articles for many papers (none of which was published by any paper). Even RSS weekly Organiser hasnt published his one article on the post-Godhra riots, though it has on Godhra and other issues. Organiser has also published some articles by others in bringing out the truth of the riots. One Marathi daily from Nagpur published his article in 2005. At last many in the BJP and RSS are awakening about the need to make this information public. You may give a thanx to the author for helping in achieve this!

5. Karthikeyan M on September 17th, 2011 10:34 AM

   Dear Admin

   I have nothing against the content of your website, seems extremely genuine, a casual reading of this website would probably exonerate narendra Modi of all the allegations he faces.

   I am, however, confused when I take this and the other goings on together and put it on a single plate, let me explain

   1. Gujarat riots has and will be the achilles heel of BJP for times to come, if the information provided by you is freely available, it is possible for BJP to get rid of their communal image and don a progressive face, then why is the BJP not making any use of this?, is the BJP not aware of the facts? I do not believe so since this is not so far down in History, another arguement can be infighting amongst BJP leaders, but the question is whether the infighting is such that they would commit political suicide together?

   2. There have been various agencies which are probing the riots, have you ever appeared before those agencies and provided them with these documents?

   3. You have produced contents from various newspapers, how sure are you that the correspondents had documentary evidence and that it was not heresay

   4. If there are indeed documents available to prove the truth of the riots, why are all agencies Supreme Court of this country included are dragging their feet, brings me to the basic question did you make these documents available to them? if not why not?

   5. Will you, instead of keeping this a mere propaganda, try to pursue cases in courts of law in India?

   You see why I am confused, I am not challenging anything which you have re-produced but the fact that none of this is public for quiet sometime really disturbs me and makes me question the veracity of what has been given here, waiting to hear from you

   Regards

   Karthik

6. xyz on April 24th, 2011 1:46 AM

   Bunch of Losers!!!

7. Ashish on December 15th, 2010 1:38 AM

   “9:5 When the sacred months are over slay the idolaters wherever you find them. Arrest them, besiege them, and lie in ambush everywhere for them. If they repent and take to prayer and render the alms levy, allow them to go their way. God is forgiving and merciful.” Quran Chapter 9 Verse 5…… This is one of the reasons why riots happen in India alongwith 2:191, 2:216, 3:28, 4:74 etc. RSS, VHP are organizations whose presence is very important in our society as a symbol of Hindu strength. I hope people recognize that the theory “Politicians divide us but all citizens of India are united” is a hoax. Quran causes the divide.

8. indian on October 15th, 2010 7:09 PM

   stop this non-sense Chirag… this is not about Gujarati …or Muslims ..it is about Indians….u should consider yourself as bhartiya before being judge-mental through religion.

9. Srikant J. on August 28th, 2010 9:15 AM

   The Wrong Way to Fight Jihad
   Posted by Jamie Glazov on Mar 26th, 2010 and filed under FrontPage. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.
   Jamie Glazov is Frontpage Magazine’s editor. He holds a Ph.D. in History with a specialty in Russian, U.S. and Canadian foreign policy. He is the author of Canadian Policy Toward Khrushchev’s Soviet Union and is the co-editor (with David Horowitz) of The Hate America Left. He edited and wrote the introduction to David Horowitz’s Left Illusions. His new book is United in Hate: The Left’s Romance with Tyranny and Terror. Email him at jamieglazov11@gmail.com.

   Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Vijay Kumar, who is currently running for the U.S. Congress as a Republican candidate for Tennessee 5th Congressional District. The Primary vote comes on August 5 of this year, and the General Election is on November 4. When he ran before, in 2008, he received about 30% of the vote in Republican Primary. His website is kumarforcongress.com. Visit his blog at kumarforcongress.net.
   FP: Vijay Kumar, welcome to Frontpage Interview.
   You are one of the rare individuals running for office in America who is actually making the issue of Islamic Jihad a significant part of your campaign. Tell us your view of Islamic Jihad and the background you have to make you see it the way you do.
   Kumar: I am a native of Hyderabad, India, which is where I first encountered the Muslim culture. We have a substantial number of Muslims there, a higher percentage than most other parts of India, and I began to observe things that troubled me. Later, I traveled a number of Islamic nations, and I lived in Iran from 1976 to 1979, during the Islamic Revolution of Ayatollah Khomeini. I immigrated to the United States in 1979. All my life, I have been interested in political thought. During my travels, I came to realize that Islam is unlike any of the other world religions for a variety of reasons, and they summate to the Islamic ideology behind Jihad.
   First, Islam was conceived as a world empire to govern all mankind. It teaches that all the world, and everyone and everything in it, already belongs to Islam–some people just haven’t been made to understand that. Until they have, according to Islam, they are considered “infidels” and inferiors. Put another way, the Islamic view is that all of us in the world are subjects of the Islamic Empire, and those of us who do not acknowledge our subjugation to it must be overcome and brought to submission, through conversion or force. No other religion in the world has such a purpose of world conquest and domination.
   Second, Islam does not allow any introspection or self-criticism. It calls for total acceptance, total submission. The very word “Islam” means “submission,” and the word “Muslim” means “one who submits.” The other side of submission, of course, is domination. Islam seeks to dominate every individual and every nation into submission. In that, it shares a key element of slavery, which the civilized world has properly decried and abolished. Such submission is a political act. I am a freeman, and I refuse to submit to Islamic hegemony.
   Third, Islam does not have any exit policy for its believers. The act of submission required to become a Muslim is held to be final, irrevocable, and permanent. So criticizing or questioning Islam or its teachings or leaders, or attempting to leave Islam, all are considered severe crimes against Islam, punishable by death.
   In contrast, non-Islamic religions allow for dissenting views, introspection, and reasoned debate. In non-Islamic religions, if you so choose, you can leave the faith you were born into without being threatened with physical violence or death. In Islam, both criticism of the faith and apostasy are capital offenses.
   All of that is what drives Jihad: Jihad is a permanent war against the unbeliever and his land to bring about his submission. It has been going on for fourteen centuries all over the world, which is why I coined the term “Universal Jihad.” Islam’s Universal Jihad is the single greatest threat to Western civilization and to the entire non-Islamic world in general. It is more dangerous than Nazism and Communism combined.
   FP: More dangerous than Nazism and Communism combined? Please explain this perspective.
   Kumar: Nazism was in power for 15 years or so. Communism was in power for about 70 years. Today, Germany, Japan, and Russia, our former adversaries, are now our allies. Also, they are liberal democracies.
   Nazism, Communism, and Islam are all three totalitarian ideologies. Communism and Nazism, though, lack a system of transcendental metaphysics, which Islam has. Nazism and Communism do not claim to be religions, and there is no threat of hell-fire to hold over its adherents. By contrast, Islam is a totalitarian form of governance that also claims to be a religion, and so has proved to be far more sustainable than any other form of aggressive totalitarianism.
   The doctrine and politics of Universal Jihad have been assaulting the world for 1,400 years. It is exactly what launched the Christian Crusades, which were an attempt to save European civilization from the relentless onslaught and wholesale murder of invading Muslim forces.
   Under Universal Jihad, non-Muslim civilizations have been annihilated. To mention just a few examples: Turkey was Christian; Iran was Zoroastrian; North Africa and the Middle East were predominantly Christian; Afghanistan and Central Asia were Buddhist; Pakistan was Hindu; Egypt was Coptic, orthodox Christian. All have fallen prey to invasion by Islam.
   Today, Universal Jihad has been brought to the West–not just by overt violence, but through every strategy and tactic conceivable. Islam is not just the faith of another immigrant group; it is a complete political and paramilitary ideology. Political Islam is here to Islamize the Western nations, and that includes the United States.
   So Universal Jihad is a permanent form of warfare against the infidels, their nation-states, and every non-Islamic form of government in the world. It has been Islam’s mandate for 1,400 years that other cultures must submit to it. Islam is devoted to an eternally-unchanging doctrine: it is obligated to conquer entire world.
   No one needs to take my word for it. Syed Abul A’ala Maududi, a Pakistani, was arguably the most influential Muslim theologian and thinker of the 20th Century. He said the following point-blank:
   “Islam wishes to destroy all States and Governments anywhere on the face of the earth which are opposed to the ideology and program of Islam regardless of the country or the Nation which rules it. The purpose of Islam is to set up a State on the basis of its own ideology and program . . . [T]he objective of Islamic Jihad is to eliminate the rule of an un-Islamic system and establish in its stead an Islamic system of State rule. Islam does not intend to confine this revolution to a single State or a few countries; the aim of Islam is to bring about a universal revolution.”
   Any Muslim or apologist who claims otherwise, or who insists that Islam is just “a religion of peace” is not arguing against me: they are arguing against their own most revered leaders and experts on Islam and its true purpose. They are spreading Islamic propaganda that has no other purpose than to lull the infidel into a false sense of friendship and security.
   Such propaganda is a primary and vitally important tool of Islam’s psychological warfare. Syed Abul A’ala Maududi also spelled out clearly how many different ways Universal Jihad is to be waged against ”the infidels”:
   “In the jihad in the way of Allah, active combat is not always the role on the battlefield, nor can everyone fight in the front line. Just for one single battle preparations have often to be made for decades on end and the plans deeply laid, and while only some thousands fight in the front line there are behind them millions engaged in various tasks which, though small themselves, contribute directly to the supreme effort.”
   Unlike any other religion anywhere in the world, Islam’s clear, inarguable overarching purpose is Universal Jihad and global conquest, using any means. It is not waged just through terrorism and violent conflict. That is an extraordinarily naive view. Islam also uses psychological warfare, propaganda, covert operations, infiltration, and demographic saturation.
   Universal Jihad exists and no amount liberal “political correctness” is going to wish it away. It is here on the soil of the United States right this minute. Its openly-declared goal is to destroy the United States as a system of government, to tear up our Constitution, and subject us all to Islamic totalitarianism under Sharia law.
   FP: Let me ask you this: World War I was won in four years, World War II was won in six years. But the Israel/Palestine and the India/Pakistan conflicts have not resolved after 62 years. Why do you think?

   Kumar: It’s simple: Muslims do not want peace, they want conquest. When they enter into an alleged “peace accord,” it is only a ploy to buy time to build their position for ultimate conquest. This is by their own creed: in Islam’s system of “ethics,” it is perfectly acceptable to lie to mere infidels.
   In the case of Israel, the West has never been 100% behind Israeli sovereignty. Both the West and Israel have always only wanted to buy truce with the Islamic nations–never peace. It is an endless case of appeasement that puts Neville Chamberlain to shame.
   As I have said before, and as history proves conclusively and invariably, Islam does not recognize pluralism, and Islam never wants a lasting peace with any non-Islamic people or states. When Muslims are in a relatively weak position they may offer truce–a temporary agreement–but never lasting peace. Even a cursory study of the treaties made by Muhammad proves at once that every Islamic treaty is merely another tactic toward ultimate conquest and domination. He set the standard for using treaties as a path to conquest.
   Since then, Islam has been waging a relentless war for the past 1,400 years against every non-Muslim within their reach. In the last century, technological advances have extended the reach of the Muslim world considerably. Anybody who believes that it’s suddenly going to change–for any reason, through any amount of “diplomacy”–is either grossly uninformed or delusional.
   Islamic imperialists have no desire at all for peaceful coexistence with Israel. They want to annihilate the “Zionist Entity.” By the way, during the last 60 years, Israel has absorbed more than a million Sephardic Jews from Arab countries. The Arab nations, on the other hand, refuse to absorb two million Palestinians. It’s a sad irony that two million Palestinians are considered so important while at the same time the suffering inflicted upon 50 million Kurdish people by Muslim nations goes almost unnoticed, unremarked.
   Muslims do not recognize the right to existence of either Israel or India. They simply consider them roadblocks to world conquest that need to be removed, no matter what it takes, no matter how long it takes. Universal Jihad is infinite, endless war against the infidel. It has been formally, blatantly declared. To the Muslim, Jewish Israel and Hindu India are nothing more than inferior infidel nation-states that must be torn down and brought under Islamic control.
   Remember this: Kashmir was a Hindu land continuously for 5,000 years. That’s over twice as long as the time that has passed since the birth of Christ. Islam went there as an imperial force, subjugated the local people, and conquered them, both politically and demographically, after 5,000 years of Hindu peace and civilization. Hence, today the Kashmiri Hindus are refugees in their own land. They have been reduced to a minority.
   It is not Kashmir alone. Now Muslims of India wants Mughalstan, the Land of Mugal empire. They want to build an Islamic state from Pakistan to Bangladesh that includes the entirety of north India.
   Every year, we are paying Islamic tribute to Pakistan, Egypt, and Palestinians in hopes of maintaining a tenuous truce. We are not really giving them “aid.” It is nothing but Islamic tribute to keep them at bay.
   It’s really too simple for anyone to try to complicate it: Islam wants the entire world to submit. India and Israel are simply two obstacles or roadblocks to that goal. If they can get Israel and India to disappear from the face of earth, Islamic Umma–community, or “nation” in the larger sense–would be one unified imperialism from Morocco to Indonesia. Then it would be Europe’s turn to be annihilated.
   FP: How do we best win the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq in your opinion?
   Kumar: It can’t be overstated or said too many times that these are merely the current fronts of open conflict in Universal Jihad. In fact, it plays into the purposes of Universal Jihadists for the Western world to be fixated on isolated actions in various geographical locations, and thereby never see the bigger picture.
   Universal Jihad is an ideology, a doctrine, that is fixed and unchanging. Waging battles of force and military action alone– especially on Islam’s home turf–and continuing to send troops out as reaction to the latest flare-ups or hot-spots in Islam’s endless war will never succeed. Never.
   That’s also why the idea of a “War on Terror” is absurd. Terrorism is nothing more than one of the many technique and tactics used to advance Islam’s political ideology. On this subject of terrorism, groups like the Taliban are a bunch of obedient foot soldiers. They are what Karl Marx called the “lumpen-proletariat.” Allow me to direct your attention to the fact that we never see Islamic Imams–religious leaders–blowing themselves up. If martyrdom is such a high holy act, as Islam’s leaders preach, why aren’t they the ones strapping on the explosives? It’s a curious case of “do as I say, not as I do.”
   Iran, Saudi Arabia, and Pakistan form the Axis of Universal Jihad. Unless and until we address the leaders of this Axis of Jihad, and the militaristic ideology of world domination that is their chief export, there is no possibility for peace in the future for humanity.
   The real power behind Universal Jihad, in all of its manifestations, lies with the Pakistani ISI–the intelligence services of Pakistan–along with the Pakistani military, the Pakistani feudal elite, and the Islamic theological leaders. As a nation-state, Pakistan exists for two reasons: its pathological hatred of India and Hindus, and its parasitic dependence on American aid. Their leaders’ battle cry is always “Islam in danger” when they want to stoke the fires of Jihad, and of course Muslims are commanded by the Quran to go forth immediately when called to fight by their Islamic leaders. (part -1)

10. Tarique on August 26th, 2010 7:03 AM

    Srikant :

    Out of your 27 points ,atleast 25 are baseless. Now here are my points which have meaning :

    - You claim hinduism as Secular, Why you didnot discuss about the Babri Masjid Demolition. If Babri masjid would not have been brought down, MUMBAI SERIAL BLAST would have been averted. But ..your favourite MR Advanci wanted to win the election on the cost of human blood. Now who is to be blame here..Hindu or Muslim….and now alse if you give poor reasons then you are uneducated.

    - Why you are discussong about the Hindu Extremist responsible for Ajmer Blast…

Leave a Reply